Yesterday, Martin and I had an interesting exchange regarding a freshly-posted conclusion to a multi-chapter story, where I had felt strongly (and TBH intemperately) that the author had let me down as a reader with an irresolute finish. Martin rightly called me out with a caution that there’s no obligation to finish a story, and he was kind enough to engage me in a dialogue on the subject.
As a longtime playwright and performance artist, I feel an obligation to my audience to provide them with a completed journey. My take is that I’m obliged to give them an exciting ride all the way to the destination; whether that destination is a “happy ending” or something less neat, it’s a definite point of resolution.
Martin offered that my stance doesn’t necessarily hold from the author’s POV; writing is done as a labor of love, and the goal of the author isn’t necessarily to provide a conclusion or resolution; we can write for our own pleasure and satisfaction and can feel free to share our work without feeling the pressure of that Sword of Damocles over our heads. (@Corin, please correct me if my interpretation is faulty.)
Since this forum is filled with authors I’ve followed and admired for years, I asked Martin if I could post it and he told me to go for it, so here’s the question for you: Do authors have an obligation to their readers/audience to provide some sort of resolution or conclusion to a story?
Martin got me thinking about aspects to this that I hadn’t considered, and I’d love to hear your thoughts. I’m currently in collaboration for a new work slated for fall 2024 in Berlin, and I’d like to enrich my views on this topic as part of my creative process. Thanks, and Happy New Year!